Built for everyone who shapes the educational experience.
Course feedback only works when every role in the institution can see what is happening, at the right scope, and act on it together. Korus is built around the four people who matter most — and the workflows that connect them.
Most feedback systems are built for one audience and grafted onto the others. Korus starts from the opposite premise: students, faculty, academic leaders, and administrators all need to see the same evidence — but each from a different angle, at a different scope, with different decisions to make. Here is what each role lives day to day, and what changes when the data finally connects.
Your voice. Used — not just collected.
You take time to write thoughtful feedback. You deserve a system that takes it seriously. Korus gives faculty and academic leaders the tools to actually read what you wrote, understand the patterns across courses, and use it to improve your education.
You sit through a survey at the end of the semester, write something honest, and never hear about it again. The next semester nothing seems to have changed — and you're not sure anyone read what you wrote.
Faculty read your comments organized by question. The CTL designs workshops around the patterns. Program leaders restructure course sequences when prerequisite gaps show up. Your verbatim feedback is the source of every claim in every report.
What they actually experience
- A survey experience that respects your time
- SSO from the first click; save and resume on any device
- FERPA confidentiality designed in — individual responses aren't visible until enough students have responded
- Crisis-resource link on every survey, always one click away
What changes because you wrote it: faculty read your verbatim comments organized by question; the CTL designs workshops around the patterns; program leaders restructure sequences when prerequisite gaps show up. The institution gets better.
See what your students are saying. Improve before the semester is over.
Teaching is hard. You're trying to figure out what's landing, what's confusing, what students are struggling with. Korus gives you that picture in five minutes — with the longitudinal record to make your improvement visible over time.
Course evaluations come back as a PDF months after the semester ends — numeric scores out of context and a handful of open comments mashed together. You scan for anything actionable, file it, and move on. The work to actually improve is yours alone.
You see your section results in plain language with the verbatim comments behind every claim. Your CTL has the same view at a wider scope and can support you with workshops, peer cohorts, or targeted resources. Your five-year longitudinal record is intact — even when the instrument or platform changes.
What they actually experience
- Section summaries with verbatim student comments organized by prompt
- AI narratives that surface what's working and what's confusing, with the source comments behind every claim
- Five-year instructor summary that survives every instrument and platform change
- Self-service dashboard for schedule, response rates, results-release date, and survey preview
You're teaching intro organic chem. Students struggle in week 3. You assumed it was effort — but the section summary shows it's a prerequisite gap. You bring it to your program director. She sees the same pattern in three other courses and adds a bridging module. Next semester, week-3 performance improves — and you can see the change in your own trend line.
Lead with student voice. Back faculty with evidence.
For CTLs, deans, department chairs, and program directors. Korus is built so every academic leader works from the same evidence, at the right scope for their role — with no manual exporting, reformatting, or politicking required to align.
Decisions about curriculum, faculty support, and program review are made with data scattered across tools, exports, and inboxes. By the time you've reconciled it, the moment to act has passed — and every leader is working from a slightly different version of the truth.
Every academic leader works from the same evidence, scoped automatically to their role. You stop spending meetings aligning on what the data says and start spending them deciding what to do about it.
What they actually experience
- Topic intelligence and sentiment trends across courses, departments, and colleges
- Scatter-plot view to manage by exception and tell instructional issues from curriculum issues
- Permission appointments scope each user's view automatically — program director sees their program, dean sees the college, CTL sees the institution
- Five-year longitudinal continuity that survives instrument changes and platform migrations
A faculty member tells the CTL her students keep saying the workload is unmanageable. Discover shows the same pattern across seven courses in her school. The CTL brings it to the program director, who restructures two courses to balance the writing load. The faculty member's feedback improves — not because she changed her course, but because the curriculum context did.
Run the program with confidence and visibility.
Course-evaluation administration is high-stakes and often invisible. Korus was built around your job by people who ran exactly this kind of program for years — with the operational reliability, real-time visibility, and self-service tooling that let you focus on the program instead of the platform.
Launch week is a black box. Surveys may or may not deploy on schedule. Faculty email you with questions you can't answer until you've checked five places. When something fails, you usually hear about it from a faculty member before you hear it from the system.
You see deployment status end to end in real time. Surveys open by data-driven rule. Faculty self-serve answers to most of their own questions. When something does fail, the system tells you first — with enough context to fix it before anyone else notices.
What they actually experience
- Real-time deployment status across every section, with live response rates
- Proactive alerts when deployments fail or bounce rates spike — you hear from the system before you hear from a faculty member
- Source-driven scheduling, multi-instructor handling, and grade-submission embargoes are first-class
- Faculty self-service removes the most common support ticket from your queue
Launch week, with Korus: surveys open by data-driven rule, emails go out on their own schedule, you see live status end to end, faculty self-serve their schedule and response rates from their dashboard. You spend the week running the program — not running after it.
Four roles, one source of truth.
Korus is a coordinated system, not four products glued together. When a faculty member sees a pattern in her section summary, her CTL is seeing the same pattern at the school level, the dean is seeing it at the college level, and the program director is already restructuring the prerequisite. No exports. No politicking about whose data is right. Same evidence, different scopes, connected workflows.
Bring this story into your institution.
Schedule a 30-minute discovery call to see Korus in action — or apply for our next pilot cohort.